Modeling how autistic and non-autistic groups learn about their own and each other’s preferences – Nature Mental Health

1. Adolphs, R. The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 693–716 (2009).

   Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

2. Behrens, T., Hunt, L., Woolrich, M. & Rushworth, M. Associative learning of social value. Nature 456, 245–249 (2008).

   Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

3. Gweon, H. Inferential social learning: cognitive foundations of human social learning and teaching. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 896–910 (2021).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4. Frolichs, K. M. M., Rosenblau, G. & Korn, C. W. Incorporating social knowledge structures into computational models. Nat. Commun. 13, 6205 (2022).

   Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

5. Rosenblau, G., Frolichs, K. & Korn, C. W. A neuro-computational social learning framework to facilitate transdiagnostic classification and treatment across psychiatric disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 149, 105181 (2023).

   Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6. Ruff, C. C. & Fehr, E. The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 549–562 (2014).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

7. Zhou, Y., Han, S., Kang, P., Tobler, P. N. & Hein, G. The social transmission of empathy relies on observational reinforcement learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2313073121 (2024).

   Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8. Fareri, D. S., Chang, L. J. & Delgado, M. R. Computational substrates of social value in interpersonal collaboration. J. Neurosci. 35, 8170–8180 (2015).

   Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

9. Towner, E., Chierchia, G. & Blakemore, S.-J. Sensitivity and specificity in affective and social learning in adolescence. Trends Cogn. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.002 (2023).

10. Ezaki, T., Horita, Y., Takezawa, M. & Masuda, N. Reinforcement learning explains conditional cooperation and its moody cousin. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005034 (2016).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

11. Tomasello, M. & Vaish, A. Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 231–255 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

12. Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe, F. & Frith, U. Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain 125, 1839–1849 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

13. Rosenblau, G., Kliemann, D., Heekeren, H. R. & Dziobek, I. Approximating implicit and explicit mentalizing with two naturalistic video-based tasks in typical development and autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 953–965 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

14. Senju, A., Southgate, V., White, S. & Frith, U. Mindblind eyes: an absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science 325, 883–885 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

15. Schneider, D., Slaughter, V. P., Bayliss, A. P. & Dux, P. E. A temporally sustained implicit theory of mind deficit in autism spectrum disorders. Cognition 129, 410–417 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

16. Frith, U. Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Soc. Dev. 3, 108–124 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Bertollo, J. R. et al. Adaptive behavior in youth with autism spectrum disorder: the role of flexibility. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 50, 42–50 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

18. Biggs, E. E. & Carter, E. W. Quality of life for transition-age youth with autism or intellectual disability. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 190–204 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

19. Wallace, G. L. et al. Divergence of age-related differences in social-communication: improvements for typically developing youth but declines for youth with autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 47, 472–479 (2017).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

20. Charpentier, C. et al. P150. Computational Characterization of Social Inference Deficits Associated With Autism Traits During Observational Learning. Biol. Psychiatry 91, S147 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Wu, Q. et al. Individual differences in autism-like traits are associated with reduced goal emulation in a computational model of observational learning. Nat. Ment. Health 2, 1032–1044 (2024).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

22. Zaki, J., Kallman, S., Wimmer, G. E., Ochsner, K. & Shohamy, D. Social cognition as reinforcement learning: feedback modulates emotion inference. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 28, 1270–1282 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

23. Rosenblau, G., Korn, C. W., Dutton, A., Lee, D. & Pelphrey, K. A. Neurocognitive mechanisms of social inferences in typical and autistic adolescents. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 6, 782–791 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

24. Spackman, E. et al. Characterising insistence on sameness and circumscribed interests: a qualitative study of parent perspectives. J. Autism Dev. Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06404-4 (2024).

25. Turner-Brown, L. M., Lam, K. S. L., Holtzclaw, T. N., Dichter, G. S. & Bodfish, J. W. Phenomenology and measurement of circumscribed interests in autism spectrum disorders. Autism 15, 437–456 (2011).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

26. Marí-Bauset, S., Zazpe, I., Mari-Sanchis, A., Llopis-González, A. & Morales-Suárez-Varela, M. Food selectivity in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. J. Child Neurol. 29, 1554–1561 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27. Byrska, A. et al. Patterns of food selectivity among children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Clin. Med. 12, 5469 (2023).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

28. Milton, D. E. M. On the ontological status of autism: the ‘double empathy problem’. Disabil. Soc. 27, 883–887 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Livingston, L. A., Hargitai, L. D. & Shah, P. The double empathy problem: a derivation chain analysis and cautionary note. Psychol. Rev. 132, 744–757 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

30. Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S. & Keysers, C. Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 114–121 (2012).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

31. Redcay, E. & Schilbach, L. Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 495–505 (2019).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

32. Bolis, D., Balsters, J., Wenderoth, N., Becchio, C. & Schilbach, L. Beyond autism: introducing the dialectical misattunement hypothesis and a Bayesian account of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 50, 355–372 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

33. McNaughton, K. A., Dziura, S., Lemay, E. P., Yarger, H. A. & Redcay, E. Neural similarity and interaction success in autistic and non-autistic adolescents. Sci. Rep. 15, 7996 (2025).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

34. Crompton, C. J., Ropar, D., Evans-Williams, C. V., Flynn, E. G. & Fletcher-Watson, S. Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective. Autism Int. J. Res. Pract. 24, 1704–1712 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Bolis, D., Lahnakoski, J. M., Seidel, D., Tamm, J. & Schilbach, L. Interpersonal similarity of autistic traits predicts friendship quality. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 16, 222–231 (2021).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

36. Cahalan, S., Mitroff, S. R., Subiaul, F. & Rosenblau, G. Using the cognitive rigidity-flexibility dimension to deepen our understanding of the autism spectrum. Personal. Neurosci. 8, e3 (2025).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

37. Liu, W., Pluta, A., Charpentier, C. J. & Rosenblau, G. A computational cognitive neuroscience approach for characterizing individual differences in autism: introduction to special issue. Personal. Neurosci. 8, e2 (2025).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

38. Rødgaard, E.-M., Jensen, K., Vergnes, J.-N., Soulières, I. & Mottron, L. Temporal changes in effect sizes of studies comparing individuals with and without autism: a meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 76, 1124–1132 (2019).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

39. Agelink Van Rentergem, J. A., Deserno, M. K. & Geurts, H. M. Validation strategies for subtypes in psychiatry: a systematic review of research on autism spectrum disorder. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 87, 102033 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

40. Lombardo, M. V., Lai, M.-C. & Baron-Cohen, S. Big data approaches to decomposing heterogeneity across the autism spectrum. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 1435–1450 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

41. Sevgi, M., Diaconescu, A. O., Henco, L., Tittgemeyer, M. & Schilbach, L. Social Bayes: using Bayesian modeling to study autistic trait-related differences in social cognition. Biol. Psychiatry 87, 185–193 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42. D’Cruz, A.-M. et al. Reduced behavioral flexibility in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychology 27, 152–160 (2013).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

43. Bos, D. J. et al. Rigidity coincides with reduced cognitive control to affective cues in children with autism. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 128, 431 (2019).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

44. South, M., Newton, T. & Chamberlain, P. D. Delayed reversal learning and association with repetitive behavior in autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res. 5, 398–406 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

45. Sedgewick, F., Hill, V., Yates, R., Pickering, L. & Pellicano, E. Gender differences in the social motivation and friendship experiences of autistic and non-autistic adolescents. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 1297–1306 (2016).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

46. Bargiela, S., Steward, R. & Mandy, W. The experiences of late-diagnosed women with autism spectrum conditions: an investigation of the female autism phenotype. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 3281–3294 (2016).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

47. Whitlock, A., Fulton, K., Lai, M., Pellicano, E. & Mandy, W. Recognition of girls on the autism spectrum by primary school educators: an experimental study. Autism Res. 13, 1358–1372 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

48. Lawrence, K. E. et al. Neural responsivity to social rewards in autistic female youth. Transl. Psychiatry 10, 178 (2020).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

49. Harrop, C. et al. Sex differences in social attention in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 11, 1264–1275 (2018).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

50. Kleberg, J. L., Nyström, P., Bölte, S. & Falck-Ytter, T. Sex differences in social attention in infants at risk for autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 49, 1342–1351 (2019).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

51. Lillo, M. D. & Ferguson, H. J. Perspective-taking and social inferences in adolescents, young adults, and older adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 152, 1420–1438 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

52. Rosenblau, G., Korn, C. W. & Pelphrey, K. A. A computational account of optimizing social predictions reveals that adolescents are conservative learners in social contexts. J. Neurosci. 38, 974–988 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

53. Chistensen, R. ordinal—Regression models for ordinal data. R version 2025.12-29 CRAN https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.ordinal (2023).

54. Christensen, R. H. B. Cumulative link models for ordinal regression with the R Package ordinal. CRAN https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/vignettes/clm_article.pdf (2019).

55. Doyon, J. K., Shomstein, S. & Rosenblau, G. Feature identification learning both shapes and is shaped by spatial object-similarity representations. Commun. Psychol. 3, 77 (2025).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

56. Diaconescu, A. O. et al. Hierarchical prediction errors in midbrain and septum during social learning. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12, 618–634 (2017).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

57. Garrison, J., Erdeniz, B. & Done, J. Prediction error in reinforcement learning: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 1297–1310 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

58. Wagner, A. R. & Rescorla, A.R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. in Classical Conditioning II: Current Theory and Research (eds Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F.) 64–99 (Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972).

59. Sheppard, E., Pillai, D., Wong, G. T. L., Ropar, D. & Mitchell, P. How easy is it to read the minds of people with autism spectrum disorder?. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 1247–1254 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

60. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Yergeau, M. Empirical failures of the claim that autistic people lack a theory of mind. Arch. Sci. Psychol. 7, 102–118 (2019).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

61. Rutter, M., Bailey, A., & Lord, C. SCQ: Social Communication Questionnaire (Western Psychological Services, 2003).

62. Bodfish, J. W., Symons, F. J., Parker, D. E. & Lewis, M. H. Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: comparisons to mental retardation. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30, 237–243 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

63. Braem, S. & Egner, T. Getting a grip on cognitive flexibility. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 27, 470–476 (2018).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

64. Ionescu, T. Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas Psychol. 30, 190–200 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

65. Uddin, L. Q. Cognitive and behavioural flexibility: neural mechanisms and clinical considerations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 167–179 (2021).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

66. Dajani, D. R. & Uddin, L. Q. Demystifying cognitive flexibility: implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience. Trends Neurosci. 38, 571–578 (2015).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

67. Kissine, M. Pragmatics, cognitive flexibility and autism spectrum disorders. Mind Lang. 27, 1–28 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

68. Moseley, R., Hung, K. & Sui, J. Perceived neurotype of the other may affect self/other-representation in autistic people. Neurodiversity 3, 27546330251339560 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

69. Feliciano, P. et al. SPARK: a US cohort of 50,000 families to accelerate autism research. Neuron 97, 488–493 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

70. Sasson, N. J. et al. The Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire: prevalence and diagnostic classification. Autism Res. 6, 134–143 (2013).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

71. White, C. N., Ratcliff, R. & Starns, J. J. Diffusion models of the flanker task: discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cognit. Psychol. 63, 210–238 (2011).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

72. Wiecki, T. V., Sofer, I. & Frank, M. J. HDDM: hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in Python. Front. Neuroinformatics 7, 14 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

73. Carpenter, B. et al. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. J. Stat. Softw. 76, 1 (2017).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

74. Gabry, J., Češnovar, R., Johnson, A. & Bronder, S. cmdstanr: R interface to ‘CmdStan’. R package version 0.9.0. https://mc-stan.org/cmdstanr/ (2025).

Download references