Daily Mental Health News

Interoceptive performance is unrelated to mental health symptoms in a large multi-domain psychophysical investigation – Nature Mental Health

·

by

Leah Banellis
interoceptive-performance-is-unrelated-to-mental-health-symptoms-in-a-large-multi-domain-psychophysical-investigation-–-nature-mental-health

⏱ 11 min read

References

  1. Khalsa, S. S. et al. Interoception and mental health: a roadmap. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 3, 501–513 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nord, C. L. & Garfinkel, S. N. Interoceptive pathways to understand and treat mental health conditions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 26, 499–513 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruton, A. et al. Diminished interoceptive accuracy in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review. Psychophysiology 62, e14750 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eggart, M., Lange, A., Binser, M. J., Queri, S. & Müller-Oerlinghausen, B. Major depressive disorder is associated with impaired interoceptive accuracy: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 9, 131 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Van der Does, A. J. W., Antony, M. M., Ehlers, A. & Barsky, A. J. Heartbeat perception in panic disorder: a reanalysis. Behav. Res. Ther. 38, 47–62 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams, Z. J. et al. Characterizing interoceptive differences in autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 53, 947–962 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brewer, R., Murphy, J. & Bird, G. Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: a review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 130, 470 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Khalsa, S. S. & Lapidus, R. C. Can interoception improve the pragmatic search for biomarkers in psychiatry? Front. Psychiatry 7, 121 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nord, C. L., Lawson, R. P. & Dalgleish, T. Disrupted dorsal mid-insula activation during interoception across psychiatric disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 178, 761–770 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn, B. D. et al. Can you feel the beat? Interoceptive awareness is an interactive function of anxiety- and depression-specific symptom dimensions. Behav. Res. Ther. 48, 1133–1138 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ehlers, A. Interoception and panic disorder. Adv. Behav. Res. Ther. 15, 3–21 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Katkin, E. S. Blood, sweat, and tears: individual differences in autonomic self-perception. Psychophysiology 22, 125–137 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pollatos, O., Traut-Mattausch, E., Schroeder, H. & Schandry, R. Interoceptive awareness mediates the relationship between anxiety and the intensity of unpleasant feelings. J. Anxiety Disord. 21, 931–943 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pollatos, O., Herbert, B. M., Kaufmann, C., Auer, D. P. & Schandry, R. Interoceptive awareness, anxiety and cardiovascular reactivity to isometric exercise. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 65, 167–173 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schandry, R. Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology 18, 483–488 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Banellis, L. et al. Interoceptive ability is uncorrelated across respiratory and cardiac axes in a large scale psychophysical study. Commun. Psychol. 4, 43 (2026).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ditzer, J. et al. A meta-analytic review of child maltreatment and interoception. Nat. Ment. Health 3, 821–837 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkinson, P. M., Fotopoulou, A., Ibañez, A. & Rossell, S. Interoception in anxiety, depression, and psychosis: a review. eClinicalMedicine 73, 102673 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Loureiro, F., Ringold,Sofronia, M. & Aziz-Zadeh, L. Interoception in autism: a narrative review of behavioral and neurobiological data. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 17, 1841–1853 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Adams, K. L. et al. The association between anxiety and cardiac interoceptive accuracy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 140, 104754 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Desmedt, O. et al. How does heartbeat counting task performance relate to theoretically-relevant mental health outcomes? A meta-analysis. Collabra Psychol. 8, 33271 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Desmedt, O., Luminet, O. & Corneille, O. The heartbeat counting task largely involves non-interoceptive processes: evidence from both the original and an adapted counting task. Biol. Psychol. 138, 185–188 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hickman, L., Seyedsalehi, A., Cook, J. L., Bird, G. & Murphy, J. The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: a meta-analysis. Biol. Psychol. 156, 107949 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Murphy, J. et al. Knowledge of resting heart rate mediates the relationship between intelligence and the heartbeat counting task. Biol. Psychol. 133, 1–3 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ring, C., Brener, J., Knapp, K. & Mailloux, J. Effects of heartbeat feedback on beliefs about heart rate and heartbeat counting: a cautionary tale about interoceptive awareness. Biol. Psychol. 104, 193–198 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ring, C. & Brener, J. Heartbeat counting is unrelated to heartbeat detection: a comparison of methods to quantify interoception. Psychophysiology 55, e13084 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brener, J. & Ring, C. Towards a psychophysics of interoceptive processes: the measurement of heartbeat detection. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20160015 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics Vol. 1 (Wiley, 1966).

  29. Ainley, V., Apps, M. A. J., Fotopoulou, A. & Tsakiris, M. ‘Bodily precision’: a predictive coding account of individual differences in interoceptive accuracy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20160003 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Allen, M. & Friston, K. J. From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese 195, 2459–2482 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, R. et al. A Bayesian computational model reveals a failure to adapt interoceptive precision estimates across depression, anxiety, eating, and substance use disorders. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008484 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Garfinkel, S. N. et al. Interoceptive dimensions across cardiac and respiratory axes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20160014 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Harrison, O. et al. Interoception of breathing and its relationship with anxiety. Neuron 109, 4080–4093.e8 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Paulus, M. P. The breathing conundrum—interoceptive sensitivity and anxiety. Depress. Anxiety 30, 315–320 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tiller, J., Pain, M. & Biddle, N. Anxiety disorder and perception of inspiratory resistive loads. Chest 91, 547–551 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K. & Critchley, H. D. Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biol. Psychol. 104, 65–74 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Clemente, R., Murphy, A. & Murphy, J. The relationship between self-reported interoception and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 167, 105923 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hielscher, E. & Zopf, R. Interoceptive abnormalities and suicidality: a systematic review. Behav. Ther. 52, 1035–1054 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Huang, Y.-H., Huang, Y.-T. & Yen, N.-S. Interoceptive sensibility differentiates the predictive pattern of emotional reactivity on depression. Front. Psychol. 14, 1011584 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Desmedt, O., Heeren, A., Corneille, O. & Luminet, O. What do measures of self-report interoception measure? Insights from a systematic review, latent factor analysis, and network approach. Biol. Psychol. 169, 108289 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Murphy, J., Catmur, C. & Bird, G. Classifying individual differences in interoception: implications for the measurement of interoceptive awareness. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 26, 1467–1471 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Suksasilp, C. & Garfinkel, S. N. Towards a comprehensive assessment of interoception in a multi-dimensional framework. Biol. Psychol. 168, 108262 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Caspi, A. et al. The p factor: one general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clin. Psychol. Sci. 2, 119–137 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Smith, G. T., Atkinson, E. A., Davis, H. A., Riley, E. N. & Oltmanns, J. R. The general factor of psychopathology. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 16, 75–98 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Benwell, C. S. Y., Mohr, G., Wallberg, J., Kouadio, A. & Ince, R. A. A. Psychiatrically relevant signatures of domain-general decision-making and metacognition in the general population. npj Ment. Health Res. 1, 1–17 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gillan, C. M., Kosinski, M., Whelan, R., Phelps, E. A. & Daw, N. D. Characterizing a psychiatric symptom dimension related to deficits in goal-directed control. Elife 5, e11305 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kaczkurkin, A. N. et al. Common and dissociable regional cerebral blood flow differences associate with dimensions of psychopathology across categorical diagnoses. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 1981–1989 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Smith, S. M. et al. A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1565–1567 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Dalgleish, T., Black, M., Johnston, D. & Bevan, A. Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: current status and future directions. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 88, 179–195 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Schumann, G. et al. Stratified medicine for mental disorders. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 24, 5–50 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rössler, W. et al. Sub-clinical psychosis symptoms in young adults are risk factors for subsequent common mental disorders. Schizophr. Res. 131, 18–23 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Barkus, E., Martin, E. A., Wong, K. K. & Chan, R. C. K. The importance of studying psychopathology in subclinical populations. PsyCh Journal. 11, 147 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Heim, N. et al. Psychological interventions for interoception in mental health disorders: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 77, 530–540 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Quadt, L. et al. Interoceptive training to target anxiety in autistic adults (ADIE): a single-center, superiority randomized controlled trial. eClinicalMedicine 39, 101042 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Legrand, N. et al. The heart rate discrimination task: a psychophysical method to estimate the accuracy and precision of interoceptive beliefs. Biol. Psychol. 168, 108239 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Nikolova, N. et al. The respiratory resistance sensitivity task: an automated method for quantifying respiratory interoception and metacognition. Biol. Psychol. 170, 108325 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Courtin, A. S., Ehmsen, J. F., Banellis, L., Fardo, F. & Allen, M. G. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of interoceptive psychophysics. Behav. Res. Methods (in the press).

  58. Fleming, S. M. HMeta-d: hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings. Neurosci. Conscious. 2017, nix007 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Fleming, S. M. Metacognition and confidence: a review and synthesis. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 75, 241–268 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Fisher, H. L., Danese, A. & Moffitt, T. E. The general factor of psychopathology (p): choosing among competing models and interpreting p. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 12, 53–82 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Revelle, W. & Rocklin, T. Very simple structure: an alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivar. Behav. Res. 14, 403–414 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lee, M. D. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  63. Rosenbusch, H., Wanders, F. & Pit, I. L. The Semantic Scale Network: an online tool to detect semantic overlap of psychological scales and prevent scale redundancies. Psychol. Methods 25, 380–392 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Desmedt, O., Luminet, O., Maurage, P. & Corneille, O. Discrepancies in the definition and measurement of human interoception: a comprehensive discussion and suggested ways forward. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 20, 76–98 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Fiene, L. & Brownlow, C. Investigating interoception and body awareness in adults with and without autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 8, 709–716 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mul, C., Stagg, S. D., Herbelin, B. & Aspell, J. E. The feeling of me feeling for you: interoception, alexithymia and empathy in autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 48, 2953–2967 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pickard, H., Hirsch, C., Simonoff, E. & Happé, F. Exploring the cognitive, emotional and sensory correlates of social anxiety in autistic and neurotypical adolescents. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 61, 1317–1327 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Vig, L., Köteles, F. & Ferentzi, E. Questionnaires of interoception do not assess the same construct. PLoS ONE 17, e0273299 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Ferentzi, E. et al. Multichannel investigation of interoception: sensitivity is not a generalizable feature. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 223 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Bodart, A., Invernizzi, S., De Leener, M., Lefebvre, L. & Rossignol, M. The duration discrimination respiratory task: a new test to measure respiratory interoceptive accuracy. Psychophysiology 61, e14632 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Crucianelli, L., Enmalm, A. & Ehrsson, H. H. Interoception as independent cardiac, thermosensory, nociceptive, and affective touch perceptual submodalities. Biol. Psychol. 172, 108355 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Izagirre, N. I. et al. Investigating the relationship between cardiac interoceptive accuracy and stress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 180, 106454 (2026).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Khalsa, S. S. et al. Panic anxiety in humans with bilateral amygdala lesions: pharmacological induction via cardiorespiratory interoceptive pathways. J. Neurosci. 36, 3559–3566 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Kontsevich, L. L. & Tyler, C. W. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold. Vision Res. 39, 2729–2737 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gelman, A. & Hill, J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Higher Education from Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).

  76. McGlothlin, A. E. & Viele, K. Bayesian hierarchical models. JAMA 320, 2365–2366 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Gabry, J., Cešnovar, R., Johnson, A. & Bronder, S. cmdstanr: R interface to ‘CmdStan’. R package version 0.9.0. https://mc-stan.org/cmdstanr (2025).

  78. Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B. & Bürkner, P.-C. Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: an improved (widehat{R}) for assessing convergence of MCMC. Bayesian Anal 16, 667–718 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Maniscalco, B. & Lau, H. A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 422–430 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Guggenmos, M. Measuring metacognitive performance: type 1 performance dependence and test-retest reliability. Neurosci. Conscious. 2021, niab040 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Mehling, W. E. et al. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE 7, e48230 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Ventura-Bort, C., Wendt, J. & Weymar, M. The role of interoceptive sensibility and emotional conceptualization for the experience of emotions. Front. Psychol. 12, 712418 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Bartlett, M. S. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Br. J. Psychol. 3, 77–85 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kaiser, H. F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39, 31–36 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Barendse, M. T., Oort, F. J. & Timmerman, M. E. Using exploratory factor analysis to determine the dimensionality of discrete responses. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 22, 87–101 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Schreiber, J. B. Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 17, 1004–1011 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Goretzko, D., Pham, T. T. H. & Bühner, M. Exploratory factor analysis: current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Curr. Psychol. 40, 3510–3521 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Morey, R. D. et al. BayesFactor: computation of Bayes Factors for common designs. CRAN https://cran.r-project.org/package=BayesFactor

  89. Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D. & Fried, E. I. Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: a tutorial paper. Behav. Res. Methods 50, 195–212 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Jeffreys, H. The Theory of Probability (OUP Oxford, 1998).

Download references

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *