Health justice, resource allocation and age in suicide risk assessment – Nature Mental Health

health-justice,-resource-allocation-and-age-in-suicide-risk-assessment-–-nature-mental-health
  • GBD 2021 Suicide Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of suicide, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Public Health 10, e189–e202 (2025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Haileyesus, T. & Stone, D. M. Economic cost of U.S. suicide and nonfatal self-harm. Am. J. Prev. Med. 67, 129–133 (2024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • The Economic Cost of Suicide in the UK (Samaritans, 2024); https://www.samaritans.org/documents/2538/The_economic_cost_of_suicide_in_the_UK_-_web.pdf

  • WHO. Suicide https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide (2025).

  • Favril, L., Yu, R., Geddes, J. R. & Fazel, S. Individual-level risk factors for suicide mortality in the general population: an umbrella review. Lancet Public Health 8, e868–e877 (2023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Demesmaeker, A., Chazard, E., Hoang, A., Vaiva, G. & Amad, A. Suicide mortality after a nonfatal suicide attempt: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 56, 603–616 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olfson, M. et al. Suicide following deliberate self-harm. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 765–774 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X. L. et al. Suicide rates among people with serious mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 53, 351–361 (2023).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, D. T. et al. Suicide rates after discharge from psychiatric facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 74, 694–702 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, D. et al. Meta-analysis of suicide rates in the first week and the first month after psychiatric hospitalisation. BMJ Open 9, e023883 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, A., Lysell, H., Larsson, H., Lichtenstein, P. & Runeson, B. Suicide immediately after discharge from psychiatric inpatient care: a cohort study of nearly 2.9 million discharges. J. Clin. Psychiatry 80, 18m12172 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. L. et al. The predictive validity of the Beck Depression Inventory suicide item. J. Clin. Psychiatry 76, 1683–1686 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune, S. & Hetrick, S. Suicide risk assessments: why are we still relying on these a decade after the evidence showed they perform poorly? Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 56, 1529–1534 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fazel, S. et al. Risk of repeat self-harm among individuals presenting to healthcare services: development and validation of a clinical risk assessment model (OxSET). BMJ Ment. Health 27, e301180 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Geulayov, G. et al. Suicide following presentation to hospital for non-fatal self-harm in the Multicentre Study of Self-harm: a long-term follow-up study. Lancet Psychiatry 6, 1021–1030 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlivan, L. et al. Scales for predicting risk following self-harm: an observational study in 32 hospitals in England. BMJ Open 4, e004732 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, N. C., Stark, A., Cooperman, A., Wilhelm, S. & Cohen, I. G. Effect of patient and therapist factors on suicide risk assessment. Death Stud. 39, 433–441 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pease, J. L. et al. How Veterans Health Administration suicide prevention coordinators assess suicide risk. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 24, 401–410 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mamede, S. et al. Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. JAMA 304, 1198–1203 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, D. & Fazel, S. How accurate are suicide risk prediction models? Asking the right questions for clinical practice. Evid. Based Ment. Health 22, 125–128 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Botchway, S., Tsiachristas, A., Pollard, J. & Fazel, S. Cost-effectiveness of implementing a suicide prediction tool (OxMIS) in severe mental illness: economic modeling study. Eur. Psychiatry 66, e6 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Bossarte, R. M., Luedtke, A., Zaslavsky, A. M. & Zubizarreta, J. R. Suicide prediction models: a critical review of recent research with recommendations for the way forward. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 168–179 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. A. et al. Suicidal ideation is insensitive to suicide risk after emergency department discharge: performance characteristics of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener. Acad. Emerg. Med. 28, 621–629 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawton, K., Lascelles, K., Pitman, A., Gilbert, S. & Silverman, M. Assessment of suicide risk in mental health practice: shifting from prediction to therapeutic assessment, formulation, and risk management. Lancet Psychiatry 9, 922–928 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Runeson, B. et al. Instruments for the assessment of suicide risk: a systematic review evaluating the certainty of the evidence. PLoS ONE 12, e0180292 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Self-harm: Assessment, Management and Preventing Recurrence: [G] Evidence Review for Risk Assessment and Formulation [NG225] 12–13 (NICE, 2022); https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng225/evidence

  • The State of Health Care and Adult Social Care in England 2023/24 (Care Quality Commission, 2024); https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/2024-10/20241025_stateofcare2324_print_0.pdf

  • Endale, T. et al. Barriers and drivers to capacity-building in global mental health projects. Int. J. Ment. Health Syst. 14, 89 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J., Schartau, P., Fazel, S., Nazareth, I. & Petersen, I. Incidence of suicide within two years of a first diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or mixed anxiety and depression: an exploratory cohort study in primary care using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. eClinicalMedicine 87, 103441 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Danechi, S. Suicide Statistics Commons Library Research Briefing No 07749 (UK Parliament House of Commons, 2025); https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7749/CBP-7749.pdf#page=10.09

  • Morgan, C. et al. Self-harm in a primary care cohort of older people: incidence, clinical management, and risk of suicide and other causes of death. Lancet Psychiatry 5, 905–912 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Suffering in Silence: Age Inequality in Older People’s Mental Health Care (The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2018); https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/improving-care/campaigning-for-better-mental-health-policy/college-reports/2018-college-reports/cr221

  • Gao, M. et al. Multimodal brain connectome-based prediction of suicide risk in people with late-life depression. Nat. Ment. Health 1, 100–113 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Self-harm: Assessment, Management and Preventing Recurrence: Recommendations [NG225] Recommendation 1.5.12 (NICE, 2022); https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng225/chapter/Recommendations

  • UK Governmment. Equality Act 2010: explanatory notes. Section 3.2.2.7, indirect discrimination; https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/notes/division/3/2/2/7 (2010).

  • Overweight and Obesity Management [NG246] Recommendation 1.9.11 (NICE, 2025); https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng246/chapter/Identifying-and-assessing-overweight-obesity-and-central-adiposity

  • Horton, R. Age barriers in healthcare. Erasmus Law Re.v 13, 6 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, H. J., Abrams, D., Lamont, R. A. & Drury, L. The risks of ageism model: how ageism and negative attitudes toward age can be a barrier to active aging. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 11, 195–231 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Self-harm: Assessment, Management and Preventing Recurrence: Equality Impact Assessments [NG225] (NICE, 2022); https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng225/history

  • Daniels, N. & Sabin, J. Setting Limits Fairly: Learning to Share Resources for Health (Oxford Univ. Press, 2008).

  • Newdick, C. Can judges ration with compassion? A priority-setting rights matrix. Health Hum. Rights 20, 107–120 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. NICE vindicated in UK’s High Court. Lancet 370, 547–548 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Syrett, K. NICE and judicial review: enforcing ‘accountability for reasonableness’ through the courts. Med. Law Rev. 16, 127–140 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisai Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [2007] EWHC 1941 (Admin); https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/admin/2007/1941

  • Wasserman, D., Wasserman, C. & Hadlackzy, G. in Oxford Textbook of Suicidology and Suicide Prevention 2nd edn (ed. Wasserman, D.) 363–368 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2021).

  • Merino, Y., Adams, L. & Hall, W. J. Implicit bias and mental health professionals: priorities and directions for research. Psychiatr Serv 69, 723–725 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. D. Cardiovascular risk assessment: the foundation of preventive cardiology. Am. J. Prev. Cardiol. 1, 100008 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. C. et al. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol. Bull. 143, 187–232 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlivan, L. et al. Predictive accuracy of risk scales following self-harm: multicentre, prospective cohort study. Br. J. Psychiatry 210, 429–436 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, M. K. Y. et al. Predicting suicide following self-harm: systematic review of risk factors and risk scales. Br. J. Psychiatry 209, 277–283 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, G. et al. Predicting suicidal behaviours using clinical instruments: systematic review and meta-analysis of positive predictive values for risk scales. Br. J. Psychiatry 210, 387–395 (2017). Jun.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • House, A., Kapur, N. & Knipe, D. Thinking about suicidal thinking. Lancet Psychiatry 7, 997–1000 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, C., Huber, J., Brewer, M., Basu, A. & Large, M. Meta-analysis of clinical risk factors for suicide among people presenting to emergency departments and general hospitals with suicidal thoughts and behaviours. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 148, 491–524 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Large, M. et al. Meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies of suicide risk assessment among psychiatric patients: heterogeneity in results and lack of improvement over time. PLoS ONE 11, e0156322 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Large, M. et al. Suicide risk assessment among psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-risk categories. Psychol. Med. 48, 1119–1127 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, A., Pincham, H., Basu, A. & Large, M. Meta-analysis of risk factors for suicide after psychiatric discharge and meta-regression of the duration of follow-up. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 59, 679–691 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fazel, S. et al. Risk of death by suicide following self-harm presentations to healthcare: development and validation of a multivariable clinical prediction rule (OxSATS). BMJ Ment. Health 26, e300673 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Corke, M., Mullin, K., Angel-Scott, H., Xia, S. & Large, M. Meta-analysis of the strength of exploratory suicide prediction models: from clinicians to computers. BJPsych Open 7, e26 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Naifeh, J. A. et al. Predicting suicide attempts among US Army soldiers using information available at the time of periodic health assessments. Nat. Ment. Health 3, 242–252 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Han, R. et al. Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review. Lancet Digit. Health. 6, e367–e373 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, R. et al. Accuracy of clinician predictions of future self-harm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive studies. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 49, 23–40 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L. M. et al. Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ): a brief instrument for the pediatric emergency department. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 166, 1170–1176 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SAFE-T: Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage HHS Publication no. (SMA) 09-4432, CMHS-NSP-0193 (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2024).

  • Clinical decision making: more than just an algorithm. Lancet Oncol. 18, 1553 (2017).

  • Usher-Smith, J. A. et al. Impact of provision of cardiovascular disease risk estimates to healthcare professionals and patients: a systematic review. BMJ Open 5, e008717 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Damen, J. A. et al. Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 17, 109 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vistisen, D. et al. Prediction of first cardiovascular disease event in type 1 diabetes mellitus: the steno type 1 risk engine. Circulation 133, 1058–1066 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardiovascular Disease: Risk Assessment and Reduction, Including Lipid Modification [NG238] (NICE, 2023); https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng238

  • Early and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Diagnosis and Management [NG101] (NICE, 2024); https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng101

  • Ovarian Cancer: Identifying and Managing Familial and Genetic Risk [NG241] (NICE, 2024); https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng241

  • Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C. & Brindle, P. Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study. BMJ 357, j2099 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrat, L. A. et al. A combined risk score enhances prediction of type 1 diabetes among susceptible children. Nat. Med. 26, 1247–1255 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, G. et al. Evaluating the risk of suicide and violence in severe mental illness: a feasibility study of two risk assessment tools (OxMIS and OxMIV) in general psychiatric settings. Front. Psychiatry 13, 871213 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Senior, M. et al. Identifying predictors of suicide in severe mental illness: a feasibility study of a clinical prediction rule (Oxford Mental Illness and Suicide Tool or OxMIS). Front. Psychiatry. 11, 268 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. L. et al. Validating a predictive algorithm for suicide risk with Alaska Native populations. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 52, 696–704 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seyedsalehi, A. & Fazel, S. Clinical guidelines on self-harm and suicide prevention: taking uncertainty into account in the evidence base. BMJ Ment. Health 29, 1–3 (2026).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *