Daily Mental Health News

Ambulatory assessment in mental health: expert consensus and recommendations – Nature Mental Health

·

by

Johanna Lochner
ambulatory-assessment-in-mental-health:-expert-consensus-and-recommendations-–-nature-mental-health

References

  1. Trull, T. J. & Ebner-Priemer, U. The role of ambulatory assessment in psychological science. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23, 466–470 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Myin-Germeys, I. et al. Experience sampling methodology in mental health research: new insights and technical developments. World Psychiatry 17, 123–132 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Opel, N. & Breakspear, M. Transforming mental health research and care through artificial intelligence. Science 391, 249–258 (2026).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pill, J. The Delphi method: substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography. Socio Econ. Plan. Sci. 5, 57–71 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamaker, E. L., Mulder, J. D. & IJzendoorn, M. H. Description, prediction and causation: methodological challenges of studying child and adolescent development. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 46, 100867 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Klasnja, P. et al. Microrandomized trials: an experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions. Health Psychol. 34, 1220–1228 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heron, K. E. & Smyth, J. M. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br. J. Health Psychol. 15, 1–39 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nahum-Shani, I. et al. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann. Behav. Med. 52, 446–462 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins, L. M. Analysis of longitudinal data: the integration of theoretical model, temporal design and statistical model. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 505–528 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elmer, T., van Duijn, M. A., Ram, N. & Bringmann, L. F. Modeling categorical time-to-event data: the example of social interaction dynamics captured with eventcontingent experience sampling methods. Psychol. Methods 30, 1345–1363 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaurin, A., King, K. M. & Wright, A. G. Studying personality pathology with ecological momentary assessment: harmonizing theory and method. Personal. Disord. 14, 62–72 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seizer, L., Schiepek, G., Cornelissen, G. & Löchner, J. A primer on sampling rates of ambulatory assessments. Psychol. Methods https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000656 (2024).

  13. Ebner-Priemer, U. W. & Sawitzki, G. Ambulatory assessment of affective instability in borderline personality disorder. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 23, 238–247 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hopwood, C. J., Bleidorn, W. & Wright, A. G. Connecting theory to methods in longitudinal research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 884–894 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seiferth, C. et al. How to e-mental health: a guideline for researchers and practitioners using digital technology in the context of mental health. Nat. Mental Health 1, 542–554 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ebner-Priemer, U. W. & Santangelo, P. in Mobile Sensing in Psychology: Methods and Applications (eds Mehl, M. R. et al.) 311–328 (Guilford Press, 2024).

  17. Lücke, A. J. et al. What happens at night? Differentiating within-day and overnight affective inertia. Cogn. Emot. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2603460 (2025).

  18. Störkel, L. M., Niedtfeld, I., Schmahl, C. & Hepp, J. Does self-harm have the desired effect? Comparing non-suicidal self-injury to high-urge moments in an ambulatory assessment design. Behav. Res. Ther. 162, 104273 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kockler, T. D., Santangelo, P. S. & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. Investigating binge eating using ecological momentary assessment: the importance of an appropriate sampling frequency. Nutrients 10, 105 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Driver, C. C., Oud, J. H. & Voelkle, M. C. Continuous time structural equation modeling with R package ctsem. J. Stat. Softw. 77, 1–35 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cronbach, L. J. Test ‘reliability’: its meaning and determination. Psychometrika 12, 1–16 (1947).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schuurman, N. K. & Hamaker, E. L. Measurement error and person-specific reliability in multilevel autoregressive modeling. Psychol. Methods 24, 70–91 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dejonckheere, E. et al. Assessing the reliability of single-item momentary affective measurements in experience sampling. Psychol. Assess. 34, 1138–1154 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scott, S. B. et al. A coordinated analysis of variance in affect in daily life. Assessment 27, 1683–1698 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moskowitz, D. S. Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 66, 921–933 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Woods, W. C. et al. Psychometric evaluation of a visual interpersonal analog scale. Psychol. Assess. 35, 311–324 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hawkins, A. A. et al. The structure of borderline personality disorder symptoms: a multi-method, multi-sample examination. Personal. Disord. 5, 380 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Edershile, E. A. et al. A day in the life of narcissus: measuring narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability in daily life. Psychol. Assess. 31, 913–924 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tomko, R. L. et al. Measuring impulsivity in daily life: the momentary impulsivity scale. Psychol. Assess. 26, 339–349 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wright, A. G., Ringwald, W. R. & Zimmermann, J. Measuring multidimensional hierarchies of psychopathology in daily life. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h8npk (2023).

  31. Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J. & Zyphur, M. J. Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychol. Methods 19, 72–91 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wright, A. G. & Zimmermann, J. Applied ambulatory assessment: integrating idiographic and nomothetic principles of measurement. Psychol. Assess. 31, 1467–1480 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Calamia, M. Practical considerations for evaluating reliability in ambulatory assessment studies. Psychol. Assess. 31, 285–291 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Trull, T. J. & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. Ambulatory assessment in psychopathology research: a review of recommended reporting guidelines and current practices. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 129, 56–63 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Neubauer, A. B., Voelkle, M. C., Voss, A. & Merten, U. K. Estimating reliability of within-person couplings in a multilevel framework. J. Pers. Assess. 102, 10–21 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Eisele, G. et al. ESM-Q: a consensus-based quality assessment tool for experience sampling method items. Behav. Res. Methods 57, 124 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Siepe, B. S. et al. Understanding EMA data: a tutorial on exploring item performance in ecological momentary assessment data. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dvj8g (2024).

  38. Haslbeck, J., Ryan, O. & Dablander, F. Multimodality and skewness in emotion time series. Emotion 23, 2117–2141 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mehl, M. R. et al. Mobile Sensing in Psychology: Methods and Applications (Guilford Press, 2023).

  40. Reichert, M. et al. Within-subject associations between mood dimensions and nonexercise activity: an ambulatory assessment approach using repeated real-time and objective data. Front. Psychol. 7, 204418 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Velozo, J. D. C. et al. Designing daily-life research combining experience sampling method with parallel data. Psychol. Med. 54, 98–107 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Langener, A. M. et al. It’s all about timing: exploring different temporal resolutions for analyzing digital-phenotyping data. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 7, 25152459231202677 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wrzus, C. & Schoedel, R. in Mobile Sensing in Psychology: Methods and Applications (eds Mehl, M. R. et al.) 53–81 (Guilford Press, 2023).

  44. Wadle, L.-M. & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. Smart digital phenotyping. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 76, 1–2 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Geus, E. J. & Gevonden, M. J. in Mobile Sensing in Psychology: Methods and Applications (eds Mehl, M. R. et al.) 129–167 (Guilford Press, 2023).

  46. Giurgiu, M. & Bussmann, J. H. in Mobile Sensing in Psychology: Methods and Applications (eds Mehl, M. R. et al.) 105–128 (Guilford Press, 2023).

  47. Mehl, M. R. The electronically activated recorder (EAR) a method for the naturalistic observation of daily social behavior. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26, 184–190 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Reichert, M. et al. Studying the impact of built environments on human mental health in everyday life: methodological developments, state-of-the-art and technological frontiers. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 32, 158–164 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Keusch, F., Struminskaya, B., Antoun, C., Couper, M. P. & Kreuter, F. Willingness to participate in passive mobile data collection. Public Opin. Q. 83, 210–235 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Stone, A. A. & Shiffman, S. Capturing momentary, self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines. Ann. Behav. Med. 24, 236–243 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Eisele, G. et al. The effects of sampling frequency and questionnaire length on perceived burden, compliance, and careless responding in experience sampling data in a student population. Assessment 29, 136–151 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Vachon, H., Viechtbauer, W., Rintala, A. & Myin-Germeys, I. Compliance and retention with the experience sampling method over the continuum of severe mental disorders: meta-analysis and recommendations. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, 14475 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Silvia, P. J., Kwapil, T. R., Walsh, M. A. & Myin-Germeys, I. Planned missing data designs in experience-sampling research: Monte carlo simulations of efficient designs for assessing within-person constructs. Behav. Res. Methods 46, 41–54 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Schneider, S. et al. Just-in-time adaptive ecological momentary assessment (JITA-EMA). Behav. Res. Methods 56, 765–783 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Wrzus, C. & Neubauer, A. B. Ecological momentary assessment: a meta-analysis on designs, samples and compliance across research fields. Assessment 30, 825–846 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Stone, A. A., Schneider, S. & Smyth, J. M. Evaluation of pressing issues in ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 19, 107–131 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cain, A. E., Depp, C. A. & Jeste, D. V. Ecological momentary assessment in aging research: a critical review. J. Psychiatr. Res. 43, 987–996 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Scott, S. B. et al. The effects of stress on cognitive aging, physiology and emotion (ESCAPE) project. BMC Psychiatry 15, 146 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Sokolovsky, A. W., Mermelstein, R. J. & Hedeker, D. Factors predicting compliance to ecological momentary assessment among adolescent smokers. Nicotin Tob. Res. 16, 351–358 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rintala, A., Wampers, M., Myin-Germeys, I. & Viechtbauer, W. Response compliance and predictors thereof in studies using the experience sampling method. Psychol. Assess. 31, 226–235 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Graham, J. W. Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 549–576 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Aaron, L. A., Mancl, L., Turner, J. A., Sawchuk, C. N. & Klein, K. M. Reasons for missing interviews in the daily electronic assessment of pain, mood and stress. Pain 109, 389–398 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Oleson, J. J., Jones, M. A., Jorgensen, E. J. & Wu, Y.-H. Statistical considerations for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 65, 344–360 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Beck, E. D. & Thapa, S. in Mobile Sensing in Psychology: Methods and Applications (eds Mehl, M. R. et al.) 386–408 (Guilford Press, 2023).

  65. Hamaker, E. L., Grasman, R. P. & Kamphuis, J. H. Modeling BAS dysregulation in bipolar disorder: illustrating the potential of time series analysis. Assessment 23, 436–446 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Seizer, L., Fuchs, D., Bliem, H. R. & Schubert, C. Emotional states predict cellular immune system activity under conditions of life as it is lived: a multivariate time-series analysis approach. PLoS ONE 18, 0290032 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L. & Muthén, B. Dynamic structural equation models. Struct. Equ. Modeling 25, 359–388 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ntekouli, M., Spanakis, G., Waldorp, L. & Roefs, A. Exploiting individual graph structures to enhance ecological momentary assessment (EMA) forecasting. In IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops 158–166; https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDEW61823.2024.00027 (IEEE, 2024).

  69. Slipetz, L. R. et al. Analyzing ecological momentary assessment data with state-space models: considerations and recommendations. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.03214 (2023).

  70. Brandmaier, A. M. in Mobile Sensing in Psychology: Methods and Applications (eds Mehl, M. R. et al.) 409–431 (Guilford Press, 2024).

  71. Cohen, J. A. in Methodological Issues and Strategies in Clinical Research 4th edn (ed. Kazdin, A. E.) 279–284 (American Psychological Association, 2016).

  72. Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M. & Ware, J. H. Applied Longitudinal Analysis (Wiley, 2011).

  73. Bosker, R. J., Snijders, T. A. & Guldemond, H. PINT (Power IN Two-level Designs): estimating standard errors of regression coefficients in hierarchical linear models for power calculations. User’s manual. RU Groningen/UT-NWO Project 500-278-203 (RU Groningen, 1999).

  74. Green, P. & MacLeod, C. J. SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 493–498 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Struct. Equ. Model. 9, 599–620 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Lafit, G. et al. Selection of the number of participants in intensive longitudinal studies: a user-friendly shiny app and tutorial for performing power analysis in multilevel regression models that account for temporal dependencies. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 4, 2515245920978738 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Janssens, J., Kiekens, G., Jaeken, M. & Kirtley, O. J. A systematic review of interpersonal processes and their measurement within experience sampling studies of self-injurious thoughts and behaviours. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 113, 102467 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Kirtley, O. J., Lafit, G., Achterhof, R., Hiekkaranta, A. P. & Myin-Germeys, I. Making the black box transparent: a template and tutorial for registration of studies using experience-sampling methods. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 4, 2515245920924686 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kirtley, O. in The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology (eds Myin-Germeys, I. & Kuppens, P.) 91–100 (2022).

  80. Tackett, J. L., Brandes, C. M. & Reardon, K. W. Leveraging the open science framework in clinical psychological assessment research. Psychol. Assess. 31, 1386–1394 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Tackett, J. L., Brandes, C. M., King, K. M. & Markon, K. E. Psychology’s replication crisis and clinical psychological science. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 15, 579–604 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Langener, A. et al. A template and tutorial for preregistering studies using passive smartphone measures. Behav. Res. Methods 56, 8289–8307 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Wilkinson, M. et al. The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship: comment. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Ummul-Kiram, K., Silverstein, P. & Moin, S. Easing into open science: a guide for graduate students and their advisors. Collabr. Psychol. 7, 18684 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Turkyilmaz-van der Velden, Y., Dintzner, N. & Teperek, M. Reproducibility starts from you today. Patterns 1, 100099 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Coppersmith, D. D. et al. Effect of frequent assessment of suicidal thinking on its incidence and severity: high-resolution real-time monitoring study. Br. J. Psychiatry 220, 41–43 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Nock, M. K. et al. Consensus statement on ethical & safety practices for conducting digital monitoring studies with people at risk of suicide and related behaviors. Psychiatr. Res. Clin. Pract. 3, 57–66 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Bai, S., Babeva, K. N., Kim, M. I. & Asarnow, J. R. Future directions for optimizing clinical science & safety: ecological momentary assessments in suicide/selfharm research. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 50, 141–153 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bentley, K. H. et al. Practices for monitoring and responding to incoming data on self-injurious thoughts and behaviors in intensive longitudinal studies: a systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 90, 102098 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Bos, F. M., Snippe, E., Bruggeman, R., Wichers, M. & Krieke, L. Insights of patients and clinicians on the promise of the experience sampling method for psychiatric care. Psychiatr. Serv. 70, 983–991 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Simons, C. et al. Effects of momentary self-monitoring on empowerment in a randomized controlled trial in patients with depression. Eur. Psychiatry 30, 900–906 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kramer, D., Bommer, P. L., Tombolini, C., Koppe, G. & Durstewitz, D. Reconstructing nonlinear dynamical systems from multi-modal time series. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.02922 (2021).

  93. König, L. M., Allmeta, A., Christlein, N., Van Emmenis, M. & Sutton, S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of reactivity to digital in-themoment measurement of health behaviour. Health Psychol. Rev. 16, 551–575 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Moore, R. C., Depp, C. A., Wetherell, J. L. & Lenze, E. J. Ecological momentary assessment versus standard assessment instruments for measuring mindfulness, depressed mood, and anxiety among older adults. J. Psychiatr. Res. 75, 116–123 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Simblett, S. et al. Barriers to and facilitators of engagement with mHealth technology for remote measurement and management of depression: qualitative analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7, 11325 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Hall, M., Lappenbusch, L. M., Wiegmann, E. & Rubel, J. A. To use or not to use: exploring therapists’ experiences with pre-treatment EMA-based personalized feedback in the TheraNet Project. Adm. Policy Mental Health 52, 41–58 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Frumkin, M. R., Piccirillo, M. L., Beck, E. D., Grossman, J. T. & Rodebaugh, T. L. Feasibility and utility of idiographic models in the clinic: a pilot study. Psychother. Res. 31, 520–534 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Bringmann, L. F., Veen, D. C., Wichers, M., Riese, H. & Stulp, G. ESMvis: a tool for visualizing individual experience sampling method (ESM) data. Qual. Life Res. 30, 3179–3188 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Ebner-Priemer, U. & Santangelo, P. Digital phenotyping: hype or hope?. Lancet Psychiatry 7, 297–299 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ludwig, V. M. et al. Limited evidence of autocorrelation signaling upcoming affective episodes: a 12-month e-diary study in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychol. Med. 54, 1844–1852 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Dao, K. P. et al. Smartphone-delivered ecological momentary interventions based on ecological momentary assessments to promote health behaviors: systematic review and adapted checklist for reporting ecological momentary assessment and intervention studies. JMIR mHealth uHealth 9, 22890 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Miralles, I. et al. Smartphone apps for the treatment of mental disorders: systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 8, 14897 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Smyth, J. M., Fred Wen, C. K. & Stone, A. A. Just-in-time adaptive ecological momentary assessment (JITA-EMA). Behav. Res. Methods 56, 765–783 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Wright, A. G. & Woods, W. C. Personalized models of psychopathology. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 16, 49–74 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Kubiak, T. & Smyth, J. M. in Digital Phenotyping and Mobile Sensing: New Developments in Psychoinformatics (eds Montag, C. & Baumeister, H.) 201–207 (Springer, 2019).

  106. Smith, K. A. et al. Digital mental health: challenges and next steps. BMJ Ment. Health 26, e300670 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Song, J., Howe, E., Oltmanns, J. R. & Fisher, A. J. Examining the concurrent and predictive validity of single items in ecological momentary assessments. Assessment 30, 1662–1671 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Gieles, E., Vogelsmeier, L., Jongerling, J., Smeets, T. & Dejonckheere, E. Participation effects in ecological momentary assessment research: a taxonomy and call to action. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cj8ut_v1 (2025).

  109. Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112, 155–159 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *