Semantic structure and measurement in large language models for psychopathology and psychometrics – Nature Mental Health

⏱ 3 min read

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Nature Mental Health (2026) Cite this article

Clinical assessment and empirical research in psychiatry rely heavily on standardized questionnaires to operationalize psychopathology. In a recent and timely contribution, Kambeitz et al. demonstrate that large language models (LLMs) capture substantial components of the empirical structure of psychopathology by reconstructing item–item associations and subdomain clustering solely from the semantic and sentiment embeddings of questionnaire items1. Their findings compellingly show that the low-dimensional structure traditionally attributed to latent psychopathological traits is, to a non-trivial extent, reflected in the linguistic properties of the instruments used to measure them. We argue that this result has broader epistemological and methodological implications than are explicitly articulated, particularly for how psychometric measurement is conceptualized and how future assessment tools might be designed. We suggest that the representational correspondence identified by Kambeitz et al.1 can be extended to a semantic account of measurement itself, an interpretation supported by convergent empirical evidence from recent work on semantic psychometrics and generative language models2.

Kambeitz et al. analyze multiple large-scale datasets and show consistent correlations between empirically observed item–item associations and those derived from LLM-based embeddings, with random forest models predicting empirical associations with moderate to high accuracy1. Notably, they demonstrate partial reconstruction of empirical clustering and subscale structures across established psychopathology questionnaires. These findings reinforce the primacy of language in psychiatric assessment: symptoms are described verbally, questionnaires are composed of linguistic items, and empirical covariance structures emerge from responses to these descriptions. The study therefore provides strong evidence that LLMs encode meaningful aspects of psychopathological structure as it is operationalized in current instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

79,00 € per year

only 6,58 € per issue

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Subjects

References

  1. Kambeitz, J. et al. Nat. Ment. Health 3, 1482–1492 https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-025-00527-y (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravenda, F. et al. Sci. Rep. 15, 37313 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21289-8 (2025).

  3. Borsboom, D. Measuring the Mind: Conceptual Issues in Contemporary Psychometrics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

  4. Wulff, D. U. & Mata, R. Nat. Hum. Behav. 9, 944–954 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02089-y (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnulf, J. K., Olsson, U. H. & Nimon, K. Front. Psychol. 15, 1308098 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308098 (2024).

  6. Ravenda, F. et al. PLoS Digit. Health 4, e0000848 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000848 (2025).

  7. Ravenda, F. et al. In Proc. 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025) 242–248 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025).

  8. Raballo, A., Ravenda, F. & Mira, A. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 79, 599–600 https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13864 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Urkin, B. et al. Schizophr. Bull. Open 5, sgae012 https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae012 (2024).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. REMEDI (REthinking MEntal health through Clinical and Data Intelligence) Lab, Euler Institute, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland

    Andrea Raballo

  2. Cantonal Sociopsychiatric Organisation, Mendrisio, Switzerland

    Andrea Raballo

  3. Department of Mental Health and Pathological Addiction, Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Service, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

    Michele Poletti

  4. Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Antonio Preti

Authors

  1. Andrea Raballo
  2. Michele Poletti
  3. Antonio Preti

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Raballo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raballo, A., Poletti, M. & Preti, A. Semantic structure and measurement in large language models for psychopathology and psychometrics. Nat. Mental Health (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-026-00712-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-026-00712-7

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *