Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S. & Stewart, G. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature 555, 175–182 (2018).
Page, M. J. & Moher, D. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review. Syst. Rev. 6, 263 (2017).
Agha, R. A. et al. Support for reporting guidelines in surgical journals needs improvement: a systematic review. Int. J. Surg. 45, 14–17 (2017).
Morrison, K. et al. Mapping meta-analyses on organochlorine pesticides reveals low methodological quality. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01634-5 (2025).
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. & for the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Brit. Med. J. 339, b2535 (2009).
Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 (2021).
O’Dea, R. E. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension. Biol. Rev. 96, 1695–1722 (2021).
Tricco, A. C. et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467–473 (2018).
Schlussel, M. M. et al. Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 159, 246–256 (2023).
Dewidar, O., Elmestekawy, N. & Welch, V. Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 7, 4 (2022).
Ahmed, I. et al. How do DEI initiatives impact STEMM, and why do we still need them? Cell 186, 2506–2509 (2023).
Ferraro, C., Hemsley, A. & Sands, S. Embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI): considerations and opportunities for brand managers. Bus. Horiz. 66, 463–479 (2023).
Hinton, A. & Lambert, W. M. Moving diversity, equity, and inclusion from opinion to evidence. Cell Rep. Med. 3, 100619 (2022).
Hofstra, B. et al. The diversity–innovation paradox in science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9284–9291 (2020).
Nielsen, M. W. et al. Gender diversity leads to better science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1740–1742 (2017).
Yang, Y., Tian, T. Y., Woodruff, T. K., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2200841119 (2022).
Ford, N., Thomas, R. & Grove, J. Transparency: a central principle underpinning trustworthy guidelines. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 142, 246–248 (2022).
Moher, D. et al. Reporting on data sharing: executive position of the EQUATOR Network. BMJ https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-079694 (2024).
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C. & McGuinness, L. A. PRISMA2020: an R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and open systhesis. Campbell Syst. Rev. 18, e1230 (2022).
Kraker, P., Leony, D., Reinhardt, W., Gü, N. A. & Beham, N. The case for an open science in technology enhanced learning. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 3, 643–654 (2011).
Page, M. J. et al. Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 118, 60–68 (2020).
Amano, T., González-Varo, J. P. & Sutherland, W. J. Languages are still a major barrier to global science. PLoS Biol. 14, e2000933 (2016).
Eysenbach, G. Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biol. 4, e157 (2006).
Nosek, B. A. et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science 348, 1422–1425 (2015).
Fisher, O. J. et al. Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research and funding: reflections from a digital manufacturing research network. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 9, 5 (2024).
Kent, B. A. et al. Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001680 (2022).
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Simera, I. & Altman, D. G. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med. 7, e1000217 (2010).
Nguyen, P.-Y. et al. Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study. BMJ https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072428 (2022).
Page, M. J. et al. Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 147, 1–10 (2022).
Gattrell, W. T. et al. ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): a reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Med. 21, e1004326 (2024).
Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P. & Pullin, A. S. ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environ Evid 7, 7 (2018).
Han, S. et al. A checklist is associated with increased quality of reporting preclinical biomedical research: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 12, e0183591 (2017).
The NPQIP Collaborative group et al. Did a change in Nature journals’ editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting? BMJ Open Sci. 3, e000035 (2019).
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Brennan, S. & McKenzie, J. E. The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence. Syst. Rev. 12, 196 (2023).
Morrison, K. et al. MATES: a tool for appraising the completeness with which a meta-analysis has been reported. Environ. Int. 207, 109935 (2026).
Hollands, G. J. et al. Methods used to conceptualize dimensions of health equity impacts of public health interventions in systematic reviews. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 169, 111312 (2024).
Bertram, M. G. et al. Open science. Curr. Biol. 33, R792–R797 (2023).
Gomes, D. G. E. et al. Why don’t we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices. Proc. Biol. Sci. 289, 20221113 (2022).
Morrison, K., Lagisz, M., Santana, M. S., Nakagawa, S. & Yang, Y. A meta-epidemiology study of the diversity, transparency and accessibility of PRISMA and its extensions: a protocol. OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PDZ4J (2024).
Nakagawa, S. et al. Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributions. Nat. Commun. 14, 1788 (2023).
Rethlefsen, M. L. et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 10, 39 (2021).
Elsman, E. B. M. et al. Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. Qual. Life. Res. 33, 2029–2046 (2024).
Guise, J.-M. et al. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 90, 43–50 (2017).
Hutton, B. et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann. Intern. Med. 162, 777–784 (2015).
McInnes, M. D. F. et al. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319, 388–396 (2018).
PRISMA-P Group et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 4, 1 (2015).
Stewart, L. A. et al. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data: the PRISMA-IPD statement. JAMA 313, 1657 (2015).
Welch, V. et al. PRISMA-Equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity. PLoS Med. 9, e1001333 (2012).
Zhang, X. et al. PRISMA extension for moxibustion 2020: recommendations, explanation, and elaboration. Syst. Rev. 9, 247 (2020).
Zorzela, L. et al. PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews. BMJ https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i157 (2016).
Westgate, M. & Grames, E. synthesisr: Import, assemble, and deduplicate bibliographic datasets. R package version 0.4 (2026).
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. & Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5, 210 (2016).
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Posit Team. RStudio: integrated development environment for R (Posit Software, 2025).
Wickham, H. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).
Leave a Reply